Mr Colin Cole


Thursday, 28 September 2006

 

David Rutter

Senior Ptnr

Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar

Dear David

I refer you to the contents of http://www.mcp-law.org/page2.html

 In these letters PUBLISHED as long ago as three months previous.
(I always like to PLAN ahead) I asked some very simple and reasonable questions. Further I told you what would happen if I did not receive some HONEST replies.
When someone refuses to answer elementary questions there is always a reason. Usually because to do so, will reveal a LIE, a DECEPTION, a CONSPIRACY of some sort. (client confidentiality does not apply here, the questions are far too basic for that) BECAUSE of your failure to explain, it IS REASONABLE for me to now assume that the above is the case.

 

You have had three months to reply, but declined to do so.  And therefore, I do not believe your fairy story, that your client bought the 243 property unwittingly at an auction, since you will not give the date or whereabouts of that event.  You believed that by telling me, on behalf of your clients, a cock and bull story about an auction, I would think your clients had bought the property in all innocence.
BUT NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH COULD IT?
 

Even if that part does, in the unlikely event turn out to be true, with regard to the auction. Your answer, was clearly designed as a devious response in an attempt to protect your client’s position. WORSE it was a pathetic, patronising and clumsy attempt in the extreme. Any Solicitor would know, that the fact that someone purchased a property at auction does NOT absolve them from liability.
Which is what this endeavor was clearly designed to avoid.
And therefore had no place as an honest response to an honest question.

I believe that W I Properties knew exactly (or thought they did) what they were buying and thought, because they are resident in N I, they would be difficult to sue, could get away with it, and be able to AVOID their responsibilities and LIABILITIES.

And that you, CONSPIRED with them to facilitate that goal.

 

I intend to label your firm . . . . . LIARS, CHEATS, CONSPIRATORS, and WANKERS along with W I Properties, IWG and Denniss Matthews from now on.
And you have only yourselves to blame for that disdain.
ANYONE WHO CONSPIRES AGAINST ANOTHER IS BENEATH CONTEMPT. To do so for paltry gain is worse. As I have said . . . your silence on the subject will no longer be tolerated. Nevertheless you still have this opportunity to refute all of the above. (provided it is accompanied with a reasonable explanation for rebuttal, if you can.)

    Future silence will of course over time go increasingly against you. . . . . the Internet will take of that. It is just a fact of life.
What will also become apparent to others if you fail to counter the disdain I will heap on you. Is that you are not capable of defending your position in a Court of Law. In other words, not worthy to call yourselves Solicitors, especially charging other clients for that very service. . . . . http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/page5.html

I will now set about making the Internet a place you will no longer wish to go. As I have done for others. . . . who were equally deserving and forewarned but failed to heed. My sites are powerful enough to blast all but the very biggest Companies from the web.

To do so to your sites will be a walk in the park.
 

Colin Clifford “ignoring me is not an option” Cole

Cc www.mcp-law.org

Chambers Dictionary ; Wanker  . . worthless, contemptible person.

So! . . . You want Denniss Matthews Solicitors, to protect your interests and good name? They can’t even protect their own otherwise they wouldn’t be here.
wp4fd7d0e3.jpg
You got any threats to make Denniss Matthews? Or WANKERS IWG.
TRY ‘EM ON ME.
 Colin Clifford Cole
More Dirty Tricks. This time from IWG . . . . . . (see also Law Society Dirty Tricks Page)
They are at it again. This time Tossers Ingram Winter Green are making the threats. One of my sites was closed down this week 18/09/06. . for all of a day. The way it works is. Knowing they can do nothing about these sites through proper and legal means. The ones they charge exorbitant sums, executing for other people.  What Firms like IWG and Denniss Matthews (see below) do instead is. They send what are called ‘Cease & Desist’ notices to the site’s Hosting Co.  The Hosts only get 10’s of pounds a year for hosting a site so really can’t afford to get involved. So whatever the argument they simple comply. They know the threats are malicious, and unfounded, since the complainant would sue the author if they were not. But the hosts cannot afford to fight them. Fortunately there are other hosts offshore who won’t be bullied by bent Solicitors. The reason IWG can’t do anything about these sites properly is. Even they are not going to go to Court and swear on oath they did not conspire to lie and cheat me. But they thought nothing of deliberately lying in writing to me for the profit of  their client originally. But denying it in a witness box is a whole new ball game. As dear ol’ Jeffery Archer, and Jonathan Aitken found out. . . . .  Click here
CONSPIRATORS Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley and Islington have been very busy. They managed to close half my sites for a little while. . . So they are going to be hosted  elsewhere from now on (as you can see). Denniss Matthews wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if they took me to Court otherwise they would do so . . . so they threatened  my hosting Co . . see Law Society Dirty Tricks page . . . . And of course my  Letter to Denniss Matthews

Followers of my sites might have noticed that they have been down more than they have been up these last two weeks .May 2006 . . That is because since they were moved offshore to escape legal dirty tricks the servers have been under constant attack . . . Enough to destroy the hard drives. . . Can’t say who it is of course and it can’t be Ingram Winter Green or Denniss Matthews because they aren’t even clever enough to be Solicitors.  . . However  I’m told they know a man who is clever enough and he is the crook Mohammed Yaseen who used to be MD (before he went to prison) at nscglobal (a Co that David Ingram of IWG, is also a Dir) . . . . . .   BUT is he the same Managing Director now at nscglobal under another but very similar name, Yaseen Khan as I am informed ?  . . . . care to confirm or deny that any of you? . . . Not so far they haven’t. . . . . . Answers on a mailbag please.

Metcalfe Copeman Pettefar Solicitor's last chance to tell me the truth. . . .
 I have been writing to MCP Law for the best part of half a year. The replies I have received have been deliberately sparse (they know what I do to dishonest solicitors ) but disingenuous, and deliberately misleading. In answer to the simple question? . . “Were you informed of the DISPUTE at the property when your clients W I Property bought it? . . The answer was our clients were not informed about the flue . . . Which has very little to do with the question and is the answer to another question entirely. . . So I ask them . . Did you make enquiries before contact? . . The answer I get is . . Our client bought the property at a public auction . . Which again is not the least bit relevant as they well know . . Where they come really unstuck is . . . “Ok which auction?” . . . To which they do not have a reply. Surprise surprise.  . . The following letter was their last chance to come clean. Before I splatter them all over the Internet.

Colin Blasts IWG (Ingram Winter Green off the WEB click here) Their own site was bottom of page three the last time felt like going that far down the list to look for them.
Denniss Matthews get a new LOGO

DISCLAIMER . .  

My claims made on this  and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is.

It never ceases to amaze me. What search engines make of your pages. It sometimes seems they know how to be ironic. These two results are top of page 1 on MSN Search . . . nscglobal ltd . . Which really must piss them off when you consider how much work they have done to try counteract those searches. . . all to no avail it seems

Jailbird MD nscglobal ltd Mohammed Yaseen or nscglobal MD Yaseen Khan?

Jailbird MD nscglobal Mohammed Yaseen or nscglobal MD Yaseen Khan? ... nscglobal employs only the best people in the industry. Individuals come from a wide spectrum of ... . . . what? prisons?
www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page26.html

nscglobal MD? Crook Mohammed Yaseen or Yaseen Kahn?

nscglobal MD? Crook Mohammed Yaseen or Yaseen Kahn? ... David Ingram is not only a Ptnr at these TOSSER Solicitors IWG , but a Director at NSC GLOBAL Ltd
www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page3.html ·  Show more results from "www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk".

David Rutter

Jaqueline
Hesketh

Alison Muir

Lisa
Richardson

Richard Carlson

Dawn Coller

Sarah Adlam

Jonathan Burton

Paul Garner

Simon Scott

Andy Littlefield

Andrew Davies

wp0aeccbdf.jpg

At the End where we find . . . . YET MCP Law say their client’s Aunty and Uncle were able to buy this property, through the patronage of plaintiff 1’s ‘fixer’ . . . . without having to go through ANY of the above. . .  . . . . what an INCREDIBLE story . . . . . SWORN ON OATH TO THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. . . . by both plaintiffs and MCP’s J Burton and presented to the Court by Sarah Adlam and her pet Barrister Matthew Hutchings as FACT.

COLIN IS BACK . . . My sites have fallen by the wayside for a year while I was being sued unsuccessfully in the High Court of Justice . . . . Not for Defamation or Lible; because every word in them is true. . . but for Harassment under the 1997 Act. . . Trouble is  . . One of MCP clients had to PERJURE himself to do it. With the assistance of MCP Law of course who had no right to be in the same Courtroom, even as a spectator, according to the rules, let alone prosecuting. There will be a tale to tell of Conspiracy to Defraud. Theft, Fraud,  Conspiracy to Perjure, and just about every malpractice a Solicitor Sarah Adlam and Barrister Matthew Hutchings could manage.
 The main reason my Police sites were reinstated is not to have a go at dear old Sir Ian . . . He’s got enough criticism out there without mine. It was because it became impossible to re-launch all my sites individually . . . . They are so intricately entwined.. BESIDES . . . It’s about time The Police started doing their JOB  . . . ARRESTING CRIMINALS and PERJURERS and not making excuses NOT TO
BUT  a clever and only reasonably determined detective, (or reporter) who actually wants to clear up such crimes as PERJURY with WRITTEN EVIDENCE,  . . .none of this hearsay stuff . . . . TO cover up FRAUD, CONSPIRACY to DEFRAUD, THEFT . . . and very likely, MONEY LAUNDERING as well . . . . . . needing only a day or so to spare .  Can follow the clues on my sites . . . . then answer  the question at the end.
 Why have I had to re-launch this site? . . . because after closing it down when I had no need to, in  the honest belief that finally my complaints would be settled . . . FIFTEEN MONTHS ON . . . not only has it not been settled . . . .  but every offer WE have made to do so   . . AT THEIR REQUEST. . has been  SUBSEQUENTLY  ignored . . .
. . . . . . . and is still being ignored . . . That’s called . . . OPPRESSION by ABUSE of PROCESS.
 And we never were going to get a settlement with MCP running the show.  . . MCP to my Solicitor 11/05/07
“Additionally  we would need some form of undertaking from your client in relation to him not re-instating the web-sites . . “ . . . WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE INJUNCTION AT ALL . .  It’s what THEY wanted to happen . . Piggy backing off their clients claim to suit  THEMSELVES . . And Sarah Adlam knew that too . . . BECAUSE SHE WROTE IT.

Merelie v Newcastle Primary Care Trust . . . .
23. Moreover, the Court will no doubt generally be wary of any attempt to present as harassment, conduct which would more aptly fit within the scheme of some other tort such as defamation, but which is not available in itself as a cause of action for some reason (e.g. the statutory limitation period). . . or because it’s TRUE
55. The early indications seem to be that the courts are likely to seriously restrict the circumstances in which a claimant will be able to use the 1997 Act to bring a claim which would otherwise fail.

wp5a942e80.jpg
wpb8078238.jpg
wpe07c8df4.jpg
wpf1041c4e.jpg
wp9e04816c.jpg
wp0a0528af.jpg
wp75799bde.jpg
wp0d878e6d.jpg
wpb6cd51c3.jpg
wpc8df1768.jpg
wpa3cb4818.jpg
wp78a1cdae.jpg

A gentleman like my self doesn’t like to disparage a lady. And whilst some of them don’t actually deserve this treatment they are collectively responsible. . . Besides I doubt any of them gave a moments thought to the hurt and damage the DELIBERATE criminal behaviour of  Rutter, Richardson, Burton and ADLAM . . caused my lovely wife and kids over these past two years.

ROGUES GALLERY

PARTNERS IN CRIME
The CROOKS at MCP Law

On Scotland Yards own NOT official web site

www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk

You want to catch a few criminal easy peasy Ian?
Here they are.

Conspiracy to Defraud Contrary to Common Law. You won’t even have to do the leg work . . .it’s all here on my sites. Just follw the footsteps.  Might be safer to stick to asbos on Kids  though. Locking Lawyers up is a bit tricky. You never know what Lodge they’re in.

On this page  Partners in CRIME The CROOKS @ Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar plus the IMPORTANT letter that never made it to Court in case a Judge saw it and might have concluded how REASONABLE I had been.

Nigel BLAGS a GRANNY
 The IWG, Denniss Matthews, Nathan Teitelbaum, (Fine Land Properties) Granny Robbing Scheme . . Will they deny it? . .
Click here.

Ridaco Developments  Northern Ireland (who?) will buy your property UNSEEN . . . “NO Agent will call to INSPECT” . . We pay 10% over Guide price even if the property is falling down.  Fantastic Generosity. Only through Barnett Ross the no signature required Auctioneers. Contact A ndrew Mahon NI  for details.

It’s THE UNCREDIBLES.
Watch Aunty and Unc-redible ‘ fly’ from Northern Ireland and and buy a shop with Andrew Mahon . . . a dangerous feat with blindfolds on . . AMAZING
Visit Barnett Ross the no deposit no identification Auctioneers. We will cross out  any contract and put a TOTALLY FICTITIOUS name  in it’s place.   NO SIGNATURES? NO PROBLEM. Telephone bid but no form? Don’t despair we’ll fill it in for you. Can’t set a price? We will bid NO MAX for you.  Can’t think of a name to bid under? We’ll make one up for you. Never mind our rules. Barnett Ross’s Steven Grossman makes sure YOU get the property you want.  Barnett Ross @ Radisson SAS Portman Hotel is recommended by Wanker Solicitors IWG ‘s Daniel Ginsbury “lying piece of pigshit” Solicitor

Visit Colin’ newest site. The Great british gas home care con. See if you can guess what that’s all about?
http://www.british-gas.org

Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no signature required to bid Auctioneers.
Steven Grossman will invent a name for you.
www.barnett-ross.co.uk
www.barnettross.org.uk

wp99d67f3e.png
“ I am going to presume that Nigel Matthews  @ Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Daniel Ginsbury @ Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? .  . . Click here
Nathan Teitelbaum Granny Swindler uses Barnett Ross Auctioneers at The Radisson SAS Portman Hotel. Wankers Ingram Winter Green Conveyancing in association with The CROOKS at Metcalfe Copeman Pettefar Peterborough.