Page 1 of 19 results containing "honest solicitor" (0.15 seconds)
In less than three days MSN have made Colin’s Honest Solicitors Page FRONT PAGE NEWS. The only problem at the moment is . . no one has come forward to fill them . . . Hhhmmmm! . . Seems “Honest Solicitor” will remain an OXYMORON
READ WHAT SIR IAN BLAIR SAYS ABOUT HIS TWAT TEAM IN THE CROYDON MET POLICE? OR WHY THEY WILL HELP YOU MOVE WARDROBES IF YOU ARE BLACK IN CROYDON? .
YET . . . “This is not a matter for the Police” . Mark Stockford Crime Manager
READ THE RESULT OF THE PROMISED INVESTIGATION THAT MARK STOCKFORD, MADE INTO THE DISGRACEFUL “MATTER” OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF HIS OFFICERS IN CROYDON. . . CLICK HERE
Have I Got News For Croydon
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd, to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another. All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
DISCLAIMER . . re MCP Law Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman
& Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should
have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure
of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss
Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but
they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions
that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the
opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it
that is.
So! . . . You want Denniss Matthews Solicitors, to protect your interests and good name? They can’t even protect their own otherwise they wouldn’t be here.
CONSPIRATORS Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley and Islington have been very busy. They managed to close half my sites (for a litle while). . . So they are going to be hosted elsewhere from now on (as you can see). Denniss Matthews wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if they took me to Court otherwise they would do so . . . so they threatened my hosting Co . . see Law Society Dirty Tricks page . . . . And of course my Letter to Denniss Matthews
Followers of my sites might have noticed that they have been down more than they have been up these last two weeks (May 2006). . . That is because since they were moved offshore to escape legal dirty tricks the servers have been under constant attack . . . Enough to destroy the hard drives. . . Can’t say who it is of course but it can’t be Ingram Winter Green or Denniss Matthews because they aren’t even clever enough to be Solicitors. . . However I’m told they know a man who is clever enough and he is the NSC Global Ltd JAILBIRD Mohammed Yaseen who used to be MD before he went to prison . A Co that David Ingram of IWG, is also a Dir of BUT is he the same Managing Director now at nscglobal/ltd under another but very similar name Yaseen Khan as I am informed ? . . . . care to confirm or deny that any of you? . . . Not so far they haven’t. . .
More Dirty Tricks. This time from IWG . . . . . . (see also Law Society Dirty Tricks Page)
They are at it again. This time Tossers Ingram Winter Green are making the threats. One of my sites was closed down this week 18/09/06. . for all of a day. The way it works is. Knowing they can do nothing about these sites through proper and legal means. The ones they charge exorbitant sums, executing for other people. What Firms like IWG and Denniss Matthews (see below) do instead is. They send what are called ‘Cease & Desist’ notices to the site’s Hosting Co. The Hosts only get 10’s of pounds a year for hosting a site so really can’t afford to get involved. So whatever the argument they simple comply. They know the threats are malicious, and unfounded, since the complainant would sue the author if they were not. But the hosts cannot afford to fight them. Fortunately there are other hosts offshore who won’t be bullied by bent Solicitors. The reason IWG can’t do anything about these sites properly is. Even they are not going to go to Court and swear on oath they did not conspire to lie and cheat me. But they thought nothing of deliberately lying in writing to me for the profit of their client originally. But denying it in a witness box is a whole new ball game. As dear ol’ Jeffery Archer, and Jonathan Aitken found out. . . . . Click here
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites . . . . Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR
OLD . . . but more likely 2 years old. . . . and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution
in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats
of legal action. . . They will just be ‘trying it on’. . . besides it’s ALL true
otherwise they would have sued me.as per Google search defamation limitation.Pre-action
Protocol for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation
claims; the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm
