http://www.perceptions.couk.com/laworjustice.html#well
“Are corrupt / pervert males appointed as judges, magistrates and police-chiefs?
" We think the evidence says so "
A great site with hundreds of actual examples and argument.
http://www.unjustis.co.uk/
England has a serious problem with organised crime - The Law Society and rogue solicitors ARE the problem. Criminals - committing fraud and theft in England is easy - get a solicitor to help you. If you believe that solicitors belong to an honourable, trustworthy profession, you are gravely mistaken.
Another great site ’unjustis’ with hundreds more examples. . . . They have a link page similar to this one. http://www.unjustis.co.uk/Support/similar_sites.htm
“Are corrupt / pervert males appointed as judges, magistrates and police-
A great site with hundreds of actual examples and argument.
http://www.unjustis.co.uk/
England has a serious problem with organised crime -
http://www.tribweb.co.uk/milligan28112003.htm
Lawyers have been a law unto themselves for too long. Duncan Milligan advocates a speedy reform of the legal profession. MPs described this as deceitful and dishonest and are calling on the Law Society to ask the lawyers to repay the money in full. Unfortunately, the Law Society will probably do what it always does: nothing.
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/
Welcome to the Human-Rights web site. THE independent group of public spirited citizens whose aim is none other than to expose the established practices many fall victim to within the United Kingdom.
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/historic/justice1/reports-02/j1r02-12-02.htm
This has led the Ombudsman to "question seriously" whether the Society balances correctly the interests of the profession and the interests of the public.12
They’ve got there same problem in Scotland. . . . . And they are always complaining they don’t get the same service we do in England?
And in Ireland . . . . . . .
Lawyers have been a law unto themselves for too long. Duncan Milligan advocates a speedy reform of the legal profession. MPs described this as deceitful and dishonest and are calling on the Law Society to ask the lawyers to repay the money in full. Unfortunately, the Law Society will probably do what it always does: nothing.
http://www.human-
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/historic/justice1/reports-
They’ve got there same problem in Scotland. . . . . And they are always complaining they don’t get the same service we do in England?
And in Ireland . . . . . . .
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-1632764,00.html
O’Sullivan, who does not admit distributing the leaflets, said he initially set up the Irish website because he “couldn’t get anywhere with the legal system”.
“The way people know each other in the legal profession seems to me to be the biggest problem,” he said.
“The way people know each other in the legal profession seems to me to be the biggest problem,” he said.
http://www.derbygripe.co.uk/law.htm . . . . By Martin Mitchell
LAW SOCIETY GRAVY TRAIN HITS THE BUFFERS AT FULL SPEED
A great site well worth a visit . . .lots of other stuff too about Derby Council
LAW SOCIETY GRAVY TRAIN HITS THE BUFFERS AT FULL SPEED
A great site well worth a visit . . .lots of other stuff too about Derby Council
http://www.olso.org.uk/
This Web Site is being established to warn people that if they make a complaint to the Law Society about a Solicitor's poor service and incompetency the chances of getting a proper or fair resolution to your complaint is probably about NIL. What you will find is that instead of trying to find any positives in your complaint they will do their very best to make every possible excuse under the sun so that the solicitor will be found not guilty of doing anything wrong.
How can I improve on that?
This Web Site is being established to warn people that if they make a complaint to the Law Society about a Solicitor's poor service and incompetency the chances of getting a proper or fair resolution to your complaint is probably about NIL. What you will find is that instead of trying to find any positives in your complaint they will do their very best to make every possible excuse under the sun so that the solicitor will be found not guilty of doing anything wrong.
How can I improve on that?
You cant get into this site probably for legal reasons?
Book THE MOST CORRUPT BRITISH JUDGES: Dr A Adoko Dr Adoko won a landmark case against the law society for racial discrimination but costs over £14,000 were awarded against him by judges. He was obliged to write this book which indicates the judiciary`s bias for British authorities against the ... http://www.corruptjudges.co.uk/
Book THE MOST CORRUPT BRITISH JUDGES: Dr A Adoko Dr Adoko won a landmark case against the law society for racial discrimination but costs over £14,000 were awarded against him by judges. He was obliged to write this book which indicates the judiciary`s bias for British authorities against the ... http://www.corruptjudges.co.uk/
http://www.scottishlawyerwatch.org/
Of all the professions that have evolved in our society, none have ever come close to matching the legal profession for downright deceit and dishonesty. The legal profession is immutable, intransigent, self-protective, unaccountable, incompetent and corrupt.
THIS IS A FABULOUS SITE . SO PROFESSIONAL . WE NEED AN EQUIVALENT HERE . . IT NAMES AND SHAMES (you’d like to think so . . but some are so thick skinned) THEM ALL . . WONDERFUL STUFF.
Of all the professions that have evolved in our society, none have ever come close to matching the legal profession for downright deceit and dishonesty. The legal profession is immutable, intransigent, self-
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/news/prout/pr_131.asp?id=131
Five persons have been charged in connection with an alleged investment fraud perpetrated through three solicitors' firms. The defendants are:
Peter Edmund Barnett, solicitor (resident of Bishops Stortford) formerly of Rhodes Barlow, Hertfordshire.
Michael Wilson-Smith* (Haywards Heath) formerly of Wilson-Smith & Co., London
(* Wilson-Smith and Ruparelia are former solicitors)
Martin Tobias-Gibbins (Berkhamstead), a former client
Imdad Ullah (London ), a former client
Five persons have been charged in connection with an alleged investment fraud perpetrated through three solicitors' firms. The defendants are:
Peter Edmund Barnett, solicitor (resident of Bishops Stortford) formerly of Rhodes Barlow, Hertfordshire.
Michael Wilson-
http://www.standyourground.co.uk/
Certain business people, their accountants, solicitors and bank managers have been together in a 'ring' for some thirty years in driving people out of business and picking up their business premises, homes, farms, plots of land etc way beneath market value, financed by amongst other things black market and drugs money. Originally it was thought the area was around Aberystwyth, Mid Wales but it quickly became apparent that these scams are widespread throughout the country.
Started off as a local RANT but soon spread out.
http://www.roughjustice.org.uk/
The purpose of this website, is to give information based on my own experiences in using solicitors, ombudsmen, the Law Society, (The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors). This experience, gained from bitter and hard lessons in dealing with people who you might think were on the side of justice, especially the Law Society, hopefully will forewarn you, and make you more able to seek justice in a prepared manner. . . .
Can’t say fairer than that.
Certain business people, their accountants, solicitors and bank managers have been together in a 'ring' for some thirty years in driving people out of business and picking up their business premises, homes, farms, plots of land etc way beneath market value, financed by amongst other things black market and drugs money. Originally it was thought the area was around Aberystwyth, Mid Wales but it quickly became apparent that these scams are widespread throughout the country.
Started off as a local RANT but soon spread out.
http://www.roughjustice.org.uk/
The purpose of this website, is to give information based on my own experiences in using solicitors, ombudsmen, the Law Society, (The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors). This experience, gained from bitter and hard lessons in dealing with people who you might think were on the side of justice, especially the Law Society, hopefully will forewarn you, and make you more able to seek justice in a prepared manner. . . .
Can’t say fairer than that.
http://www.ex.ac.uk/~RDavies/arian/scandals/
While most of the cases in these pages involve real or suspected criminal activity a few are included simply because the scale of the incompetence or greed makes them scandalous.
Self explanatory.
While most of the cases in these pages involve real or suspected criminal activity a few are included simply because the scale of the incompetence or greed makes them scandalous.
Self explanatory.
http://members.aol.com/lawawful/ Theoretically it is an independent body but the Law Society has removed the previous director and taken direct control. Its inefficiency is so great that the present Lord Chancellor gave the OSS until the end of the year 2000 to put its house in order.
Less of a RANT . . but plenty of facts.
http://www.action4justice-
The mystery is not why it was "disappeared" but who-
http://www.law-
If the complaints system was run by an independent and impartial body many more solicitors would be found to be incompetent and have given poor service. The Law Society does not want to happen as it is not in their interest, and thus it controls the complaints procedures itself ,ensuring that the decisions lack what the man on the street would call logic and fairness.
This is still my favourite site . . And closest to my heart . . It takes on The Corrupt Law Society going straight for the jugular.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/3340901.stm
Even when they are caught they are let off.
http://www.ibtl.org.uk
IBTL has been established for the sole purpose of offering help, advice and assistance to people who have been ill served by the law. We are a charitable organisation who are funded entirely through grants and donations. We have been established now for almost 10 years.
Contact & Help Site for victims of the rest of these pages.
Even when they are caught they are let off.
http://www.ibtl.org.uk
IBTL has been established for the sole purpose of offering help, advice and assistance to people who have been ill served by the law. We are a charitable organisation who are funded entirely through grants and donations. We have been established now for almost 10 years.
Contact & Help Site for victims of the rest of these pages.
http://www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk/
DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER KNOW ALL! They covered up and kept the lid on Pandora’s Box of undeniable premeditated judicial corruption!! Also included in this DOCUMENTED PROOF, he has deliberately lied!
Mans got a beef. . .
http://www.freeclaim.co.uk/nnews_story6.htm
Solicitors' commercial arrangements with claims management companies undermine their duty to the client, says John Barstow. SOLICITORS ARE seen as “arrogant, slow and crooked” according to an article in the Guardian on 26 August 2002 reporting the ICM Poll commissioned by the RAC.
DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER KNOW ALL! They covered up and kept the lid on Pandora’s Box of undeniable premeditated judicial corruption!! Also included in this DOCUMENTED PROOF, he has deliberately lied!
Mans got a beef. . .
http://www.freeclaim.co.uk/nnews_story6.htm
Solicitors' commercial arrangements with claims management companies undermine their duty to the client, says John Barstow. SOLICITORS ARE seen as “arrogant, slow and crooked” according to an article in the Guardian on 26 August 2002 reporting the ICM Poll commissioned by the RAC.
http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/News.htm#Special
The Law Society in England and Wales appears to have abandoned all pretence of maintaining any decent standards at all. For those of you with an interest in this matter, you might consider how another solicitor who was struck off for lying to clients and stealing their money has been recently restored to the Roll.
Fantastic site . . full of information . . facts . . . and RANTS in between.
The Law Society in England and Wales appears to have abandoned all pretence of maintaining any decent standards at all. For those of you with an interest in this matter, you might consider how another solicitor who was struck off for lying to clients and stealing their money has been recently restored to the Roll.
Fantastic site . . full of information . . facts . . . and RANTS in between.
When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law before hel gets arrested, we call him an accomplice.
When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law after the criminal gets arrested, we call him a lawyer.
When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law after the criminal gets arrested, we call him a lawyer.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,6903,1328964,00.html
“The Law Society's less-than-heroic track-record on complaints has dogged the profession for years. In fact, it could well be its undoing. Sir David Clementi, former deputy governor of the Bank of England, is conducting a review of regulation of the legal profession which reports in December. Which?, the consumers' association, reckons the profession's inability to deal with unhappy clients is 'the greatest threat to self-regulation'.”
AND NOT BEFORE TIME . . . Let’s hope we can rid ourselves of these dishonourable people.
“The Law Society's less-
http://www.which.net/media/pr/jun04/which/solicitors.html
Almost all those who did complain to their solicitors' practice were unhappy with the way their complaint was dealt with. Nearly three quarters said their complaint wasn't resolved.
http://www.which.net/press/releases/other/050321_watchdogs_nr.html
Nick Stace, communications director, Which?, said "Self-regulation isn't working. People complain to Which? time and again about the second rate service they receive from solicitors; often during stressful times. Other professions can't get away with this type of behaviour and it's time for the government to rein in this complaint-riddled industry."
Hear Hear
Almost all those who did complain to their solicitors' practice were unhappy with the way their complaint was dealt with. Nearly three quarters said their complaint wasn't resolved.
http://www.which.net/press/releases/other/050321_watchdogs_nr.html
Nick Stace, communications director, Which?, said "Self-
Colin’s LINK pages . . . There is so much to look at out there . . . this is my attempt to assemble some good links about dodgey Solicitors . . The Corrupt Law Society. . . their stooges at The Legal Services Ombudsman . . . our lousy Local Authority Ombudman . . Lousy Met Policing . . and so much more . . . each link has a quote from that site
. . My comments are in green.
My favourite quote is however from . . . . http://www.law-society.co.uk/ . . . . . . According to Mr Taranjeet Babra the Caseworker of the Law Society, quote "if a Solicitor has been negligent it does not mean he has given poor service"
Doesn’t that just about say it all?
Except
Is it God’s little irony, that the acronym of The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors . . . is . . . TOSS’ors ??
. . My comments are in green.
My favourite quote is however from . . . . http://www.law-
Doesn’t that just about say it all?
Except
Is it God’s little irony, that the acronym of The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors . . . is . . . TOSS’ors ??
http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a W*nker is.
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a W*nker is.
http://www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to
http://www.dennissmatthews.co.uk
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another ofmy own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to.
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another ofmy own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to.
This chap is doing the same to Moss & Coleman Solicitors Hornchurch, He calls them Tossers www.mossandcoleman.co.uk
http://www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/
WALLYBALL . . . The excruciating game that any no of Solicitors can play.
HAVEN’T-A-CLUEDO . The page that shows these people up for what they really are. A bunch of tossers
ARE YOU BEING SERVED? . . . The page that teaches 5 year olds what to do with intimidating letters issued by TOSSERS.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site . . . well . . . basically takes the piss out of the lot of them.
WALLYBALL . . . The excruciating game that any no of Solicitors can play.
HAVEN’T-
ARE YOU BEING SERVED? . . . The page that teaches 5 year olds what to do with intimidating letters issued by TOSSERS.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site . . . well . . . basically takes the piss out of the lot of them.
To LGO Links & Councils Next Page >>>
LEGAL LINKS PAGE
To LGO Links & CouncilsNext Page >>>
http://www.geocities.com/profrogues/
It is a complete and utter waste of time contacting the Legal Ombudsman, as once again staff at the Ombudsman's office like Simon Entwistle, are selected by non other than the Law Society. They are swamped with client complaints, and consequently cannot cope with the influx. It is far easier for them to dismiss a claim, and hope you won't bother them anymore,than to spend time investigating your case. The Law Society and it's members top the list when it comes to "cover ups", simply because they do NOTHING to assist the public in a negligence claim. Judges also "cover up" serious solictor/barrister misconduct, and I have evidence to back up that claim.
Brilliant site . . . very concise . . gets it exactly right . . . more of the same but well put.
It is a complete and utter waste of time contacting the Legal Ombudsman, as once again staff at the Ombudsman's office like Simon Entwistle, are selected by non other than the Law Society. They are swamped with client complaints, and consequently cannot cope with the influx. It is far easier for them to dismiss a claim, and hope you won't bother them anymore,than to spend time investigating your case. The Law Society and it's members top the list when it comes to "cover ups", simply because they do NOTHING to assist the public in a negligence claim. Judges also "cover up" serious solictor/barrister misconduct, and I have evidence to back up that claim.
Brilliant site . . . very concise . . gets it exactly right . . . more of the same but well put.
http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/freedom.htm
Let me expand on the 'English Law Society's' gagging attempts. We have Richard Hegarty, Chair of the Law Society's Compliance Board who we will now refer to as 'Dickie the Chair' who instructed Willoughby & Partners in London E14 9SG with a view to taking action against my hosting company. 'Dickie the Chair' rang me on the 6 Nov '03 trying to intimidate me with the comments I have put on this web site and according to Aman Virk, Manager, Quality & Service Standards at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors also Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, they both say 'Dickie the Chair' was acting on "Law Society business", what does this tell us? Well as 'Dickie the Chair' is acting with the approval of the members of the Law Society Board let me name some of them; Chief Executive of the Law Society (who replied to me on behalf of Peter Williamson) Janet Paraskeva; The President of the Law Society (who I have previously written to) Peter Williamson; Vice President Edward Nally; Deputy Vice President (who told me 'Dickie' "hadn't disappeared") Kevin Martin; July 2004 it's that time when the 'President' line all shove up one. I wonder if that includes 'Dickie the Chair'. As can be seen 'Freedom of Speech' when against the English Law Society is something that is hard to achieve, but then again with 'Ken' our Lord Mayor of London championing the cause, may be its time to send him a letter or an e-mail.
Big site . . this one has run for years . . . I first spotted it a year ago and it gave me the ideas to do my own sites. . . It certainly works . . when I was looking for a Solicitor . . and I only live round the corner . . . I did indeed avoid Thos Boyd Whyte as the site says.
Let me expand on the 'English Law Society's' gagging attempts. We have Richard Hegarty, Chair of the Law Society's Compliance Board who we will now refer to as 'Dickie the Chair' who instructed Willoughby & Partners in London E14 9SG with a view to taking action against my hosting company. 'Dickie the Chair' rang me on the 6 Nov '03 trying to intimidate me with the comments I have put on this web site and according to Aman Virk, Manager, Quality & Service Standards at the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors also Richard Thomas, the Information Commissioner, they both say 'Dickie the Chair' was acting on "Law Society business", what does this tell us? Well as 'Dickie the Chair' is acting with the approval of the members of the Law Society Board let me name some of them; Chief Executive of the Law Society (who replied to me on behalf of Peter Williamson) Janet Paraskeva; The President of the Law Society (who I have previously written to) Peter Williamson; Vice President Edward Nally; Deputy Vice President (who told me 'Dickie' "hadn't disappeared") Kevin Martin; July 2004 it's that time when the 'President' line all shove up one. I wonder if that includes 'Dickie the Chair'. As can be seen 'Freedom of Speech' when against the English Law Society is something that is hard to achieve, but then again with 'Ken' our Lord Mayor of London championing the cause, may be its time to send him a letter or an e-
The bit about the Law Society acting against complainants leads us nicely on to . . .
http://www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page4.html
The point is Law Society . . that if there is defamation or harm to a Co caused by this. . . then it is
up to that Co to use what everyone else has to use . . . THE LAW . . . NOT other devious means like have a go at the service providers. . . . THOSE back hand days of (usually Masonic influence) are going to be over. Your impotence freely admitted in The Gazette shows that. The point is Law Society . . . These firms of Solicitors have an advantage that none us has. FREE Legal Advice . . . FREE Legal Representation . . . FREE Access to Legal Services. . . .the trouble is they wouldn’t want to rely on that advice . . if they were any good they wouldn’t be on these web sites. But we are supposed to rely on them and they expect to charge a fortune for it. “CONCERN MOUNTS” YOU SAY? . . . NOT HERE IT DOESN’T . . . YOU JUST DON’T GET IT DO YOU LAW SOCIETY? IF YOU ACTED PROPERLY HONESTLY AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE and were INCORRUPT ABLE. NONE OF US (and there will be lots more) WOULD NEED TO DO THIS. AND THE MORE PEOPLE THAT DO, THE MORE TENUOUS YOUR POSITION BECOMES. . . One day it will be GOOD RIDDANCE. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT . . YOU CAN’T DECEIVE ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. Similarly the LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN for condoning your disgraceful bias. What you’re annoyed about is your total IMPOTENCE. The fact that matters are being dealt with outside your control.
OK I admit it . . from another of my sites . . but it is a RANT entirely on behalf of Rick Kordowski in his dispute with Moss and Coleman Solicitors, Hornchurch. The point is . . there is published evidence of The Law Society’s meddling and circumnavigation of the LAW. They publish it in their own journal The Gazette 24/02/05. . . . THEY’RE BLOODY WELL PROUD OF IT . . . . for goodness sake.
http://www.sir-
up to that Co to use what everyone else has to use . . . THE LAW . . . NOT other devious means like have a go at the service providers. . . . THOSE back hand days of (usually Masonic influence) are going to be over. Your impotence freely admitted in The Gazette shows that. The point is Law Society . . . These firms of Solicitors have an advantage that none us has. FREE Legal Advice . . . FREE Legal Representation . . . FREE Access to Legal Services. . . .the trouble is they wouldn’t want to rely on that advice . . if they were any good they wouldn’t be on these web sites. But we are supposed to rely on them and they expect to charge a fortune for it. “CONCERN MOUNTS” YOU SAY? . . . NOT HERE IT DOESN’T . . . YOU JUST DON’T GET IT DO YOU LAW SOCIETY? IF YOU ACTED PROPERLY HONESTLY AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE and were INCORRUPT ABLE. NONE OF US (and there will be lots more) WOULD NEED TO DO THIS. AND THE MORE PEOPLE THAT DO, THE MORE TENUOUS YOUR POSITION BECOMES. . . One day it will be GOOD RIDDANCE. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT . . YOU CAN’T DECEIVE ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. Similarly the LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN for condoning your disgraceful bias. What you’re annoyed about is your total IMPOTENCE. The fact that matters are being dealt with outside your control.
OK I admit it . . from another of my sites . . but it is a RANT entirely on behalf of Rick Kordowski in his dispute with Moss and Coleman Solicitors, Hornchurch. The point is . . there is published evidence of The Law Society’s meddling and circumnavigation of the LAW. They publish it in their own journal The Gazette 24/02/05. . . . THEY’RE BLOODY WELL PROUD OF IT . . . . for goodness sake.
http://www.hartjournals.co.uk/le/volumes/6/issues/2/457.html
The Regulatory Crisis in the Solicitors’ Profession .Mark Davies .Sussex Law School, Uni of Sussex
Self-regulation and discipline by the solicitor’s profession is in crisis. There is evidence of failure at all levels, from the efficient resolution of straightforward complaints, to ensuring the public is not exposed to dishonest solicitors. Changes by the Law Society in recent years have either failed to meet expectations or have diverted resources away from other problems. In this article I draw together a range of criticisms of the current approach to self-regulation and raise the question of whether or not the current regulatory model is sustainable. I will consider whether changes in the size and nature of the solicitors profession has resulted in the need for radical rethinking about the fundamental nature and structure of the regulatory system.
So it’s not just us that’s saying it. The Government know it’s true . . WHY DON’T THEY DO SOMETHING?
The Regulatory Crisis in the Solicitors’ Profession .Mark Davies .Sussex Law School, Uni of Sussex
Self-
http://www.parents4protest.co.uk/p4p/solicitors.htm
P4p believes this webpage published two years ago in the naming of whom we believe are bad solicitors is justified. An opinion supported by hundreds of letters that P4p receive yearly from Fathers, Mothers, Grandparents and even Children who have reported to us the listed offices below. P4p never include on the webpage any unscrupulous FC office/s until we have received two or more detailed complaints about the same legal individual within that office.
This one is going to need a page of its’s own . . there are dozens of ‘blacklisted’ lawyers on this page. . . . I don’t know what the cases are . . I DON’T CARE . . if the allegations weren’t true the Solicitors could do something about it . . . by definition they do not deserve to be Solicitors. . . CLICK HERE >>>>
P4p believes this webpage published two years ago in the naming of whom we believe are bad solicitors is justified. An opinion supported by hundreds of letters that P4p receive yearly from Fathers, Mothers, Grandparents and even Children who have reported to us the listed offices below. P4p never include on the webpage any unscrupulous FC office/s until we have received two or more detailed complaints about the same legal individual within that office.
This one is going to need a page of its’s own . . there are dozens of ‘blacklisted’ lawyers on this page. . . . I don’t know what the cases are . . I DON’T CARE . . if the allegations weren’t true the Solicitors could do something about it . . . by definition they do not deserve to be Solicitors. . . CLICK HERE >>>>
A Solicitor enters a bar and spots a tasty looking girl sitting on a stool. He walks up to her and says, "Hey there, how's it going?" She turns around, looks him straight in the eye and says, "I'll screw anyone, any time, anywhere, your place, my place, it doesn't matter."
"Really," he replies. "What firm do you work for?"
"Really," he replies. "What firm do you work for?"
http://www.ca-la.org/html/lawyers.html
WHY CROOKED LAWYERS GO FREE "a grievance system that moves in secret , then winds up disciplining a minuscule percent of those whose conduct is complained about, can be neither effective nor creditable." Here's what must be done If your lawyer mishandles your case, charges exorbitant fee or steals your money, what can you do about it? Short of suing for malpractice , you must take your complaint to a grievance committee made up of other lawyers. What are your chances of getting a fair hearing? According to all available statistics, they are so slim that you would be wasting your time.
De je vue? . . Well actually it’s NOT The Law Society’s fault . . . This is AMERICA
WHY CROOKED LAWYERS GO FREE "a grievance system that moves in secret , then winds up disciplining a minuscule percent of those whose conduct is complained about, can be neither effective nor creditable." Here's what must be done If your lawyer mishandles your case, charges exorbitant fee or steals your money, what can you do about it? Short of suing for malpractice , you must take your complaint to a grievance committee made up of other lawyers. What are your chances of getting a fair hearing? According to all available statistics, they are so slim that you would be wasting your time.
De je vue? . . Well actually it’s NOT The Law Society’s fault . . . This is AMERICA
http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/
In their "extreme defence" first of all their Council Catriona "Merciless when necessary". Duthie, St Johns Chambers, Bristol tried lying to the Judge regarding that damning "heading" on their original estimate (the heading that stated they had included costs which were NOT my responsibility and which they had refused to explain to the Law Society or the Judge). However, they didn't push this too far because the Judge said he was tempted to ask for a transcript. If he had done so I'm sure Catriona Duthie would have weaseled out of it by claiming that her memory was at fault. Yeah, Right! It's STILL a misleading lie as far as I'm concerned... it WAS untrue... and she IS on record... trying to mislead a Judge in a family case. Umm, a bit "extreme" when all I wanted was a detailed bill? There is MORE...
A Rant about a firm of Solicitors . . .FDC Law, (Faulkner, Daniel & Cruttwell Solicitors) Norton House, High Street, Midsomer Norton, BA3 2DF - and Patricia Wayman Senior Ptnr, in particular.
This firm also has offices in Frome and Paulton. . . LOADS to see . . lots of interesting links . . . and a whole section about Fathers . . could do with linking up to parents 4 protest.
In their "extreme defence" first of all their Council Catriona "Merciless when necessary". Duthie, St Johns Chambers, Bristol tried lying to the Judge regarding that damning "heading" on their original estimate (the heading that stated they had included costs which were NOT my responsibility and which they had refused to explain to the Law Society or the Judge). However, they didn't push this too far because the Judge said he was tempted to ask for a transcript. If he had done so I'm sure Catriona Duthie would have weaseled out of it by claiming that her memory was at fault. Yeah, Right! It's STILL a misleading lie as far as I'm concerned... it WAS untrue... and she IS on record... trying to mislead a Judge in a family case. Umm, a bit "extreme" when all I wanted was a detailed bill? There is MORE...
A Rant about a firm of Solicitors . . .FDC Law, (Faulkner, Daniel & Cruttwell Solicitors) Norton House, High Street, Midsomer Norton, BA3 2DF -
This firm also has offices in Frome and Paulton. . . LOADS to see . . lots of interesting links . . . and a whole section about Fathers . . could do with linking up to parents 4 protest.
The Law Society’s Dirty Tricks Page.
In association with Richard “The Chair” Hegarty of Hegarty & Co Peterborough.
Consulting Matt Jacob of
Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
In association with Richard “The Chair” Hegarty of Hegarty & Co Peterborough.
Consulting Matt Jacob of
Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
Have I Got News For Croydon
Visit THE Croydon Council information site www.croydoncouncil.info
Ingram Winter Green are PART OF . . SUCCESSION London
Succession London brings together four partners who have considerable experience and expertise in facilitating the exit of business owners. We provide a one-stop shop that will assist the Business Link adviser.
Trinity Financial Limited -( a member of Berkeley Independent Advisers Ltd) specialised financial advice to the owner.
Unity Corporate Advisers @ Unity Trust Bank - advice on all stages of the buyout process.
Tossers Ingram Winter Green - advice on the most appropriate legal structure and tax issues.
Tower Hamlets CDA - project planning of ownership transfer and employee participation and productivity.
We are also linked to the Family Business Planning Unit of the Anglia Polytechnic University, which is part of their Centre for Business Transformation, and this provides a research input into the project.
FSA/PN/128/2005
1 December 2005
1 December 2005
The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") today imposed a public censure on Berkeley Independent Advisers Limited ("BIA") for system and control breaches. These breaches resulted in a failure to monitor adequately a sales strategy which advocated the sale of non-pension products as an alternative means of saving for retirement and a failure to ensure the suitability of sales arising from this strategy.
The breaches, which occurred during the period December 2001 to September 2004, were made more serious by the fact that BIA had received numerous warnings, including four independent expert reports, about the way these products were being sold. BIA failed to act on these warnings and by doing so exposed 3,800 customers to risk of financial loss.
Visit Colin’ newest site. The Great british gas home care con. See if you can guess what that’s all about?
http://www.british-gas.org
http://www.british-
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
DISCLAIMER . . re MCP Law Click here
My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is.
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no signature required to bid Auctioneers.
Steven
Grossman will invent a name for you.
www.barnett-
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites . . . . Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR
OLD . . . but more likely 2 years old. . . . and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution
in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats
of legal action. . . They will just be ‘trying it on’. . . besides it’s ALL true
otherwise they would have sued me.as per Google search defamation limitation.Pre-
Law Society Protecting Crooked Solicitors . . . But not from me.. . . Colin Blasts IWG (Ingram Winter Green off the WEB in 2006) Their own site was bottom of page three the last time felt like going that far down the list to look for them. . . In 2008 they are on their way out again . . Say bye bye to the Web IWG
Colin's Legal Links 1. our Corrupt Law Society. Bent solicitors, and more.